Since the very concepts of reincarnation, heaven, and hell all follow logically from these scientific characteristics (from saying, "from what we have discovered in this century about the natures of the two havlves of the mind, what would happen if each half survived death, but separately?"), if reincarnation, heaven, and hell do in fact not exist in reality, their descriptions should not have existed at all prior to the discovery of the natures of the two halves of the human psyche. They should never have been heard of in any legend, never written in any document.

Since, however, these legends did exist prior to the discovery of the science that now predicts them, one is forced to admit that one of the following two statements must be true:

(1) These afterlife legends really do refer to facts existing in reality.

(2) These afterlife legends, although not true, are all that remains of an ancient prehistoric science. Once before, mankind must have arrived at recognition of the qualities of the two halves of the psyche just as we have today, and once before mankind asked "what would happen to these two halves if each survived death, but separated from the other half".

And since these traditions seem to occur in isolated cultures all across the world and throughout history, it would indeed be hard to argue that all of them are the inter-related descendents of such a prehistoric science. Thus, the anachronism seems to function as proof for Division Theory.

D I V I S I O N T H E O R Y
Is Fully Explored In

THE DIVISION OF CONSCIOUSNESS
THE SECRET AFTERLIFE OF THE HUMAN PSYCHE

After death, are we reborn to live another life here, or do our spirits cross over to an eternal afterlife? Eastern and Western philosophies have disagreed on this point for thousands of years. But a compelling new theory has recently arisen, suggesting for the first time that each of these ancient perspectives may simultaneously be true. After the tragic suicide of his wife, Peter Novak immersed himself for 10 years into the study of the evidence for life after death. Drawing on mythology, psychology, religion and science, as well as past-life regression, near death experiences, and reports of ghosts and apparitions, Novak ultimately realized that a single scientific theory could neatly account for virtually all reported afterlife phenomena, suggesting that these reports all have a common basis in reality.

The deceptively simple premise of Novak's "Division Theory" is that our psyches do survive the demise of the physical body, but at the tragic cost of being ripped apart into two separate pieces, each of which goes on without the other into a different, crippled afterlife experience. The conscious mind, known for eons in the East as the Spirit, loses its memory and goes on to reincarnate. The unconscious mind, known for eons in the West as the Soul, becomes trapped in a heavenly or hellish afterlife dreamworld of its own unwitting creation. This startling conclusion not only explains the differences between many of the world's great religions, but also shows that humanity's intuitions about the soul's survival has a reality separate and distinct from the mind's philosophical conflicts.

PUBLISHED IN 1997 BY



ON SALE NOW AT

|Reviews |Table of Contents| Bibliography| About the Author|
|The Lost Christian Gospels Unearthed at Nag Hammadi|





HOW
D I V I D E D
ARE YOU
ALREADY?

© 1997 division@csinet.net